you know, i think there needs to be a guide about arguing or something
like:
not to do: Charlie is a wrong bastard
slightly better: charlie is a wrong basterd (or any sware) because of his hatred of cuda
better: charlie is a wrong basterd (or any sware) because of his hatred of cuda as cuda allows for 1) 2) 3) etc.
getting there: charlie is a wrong basterd (or any sware) because of his hatred of cuda as cuda allows for 1) 2) 3) etc. and this affects the majority of the market / this affects me and is my personal opinion of him
the best way to go: contrary to charlie's views, cuda is good as cuda allows for 1) 2) 3) etc. and this affects the majority of the market / this affects me and is my personal opinion of him
and have like a scale of likely hood of granny interference associated with each go or something
|