|
|
|||||||
| CPUs Talk about processors and related technology |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#561
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is what will actually be interesting. I think it is TechReport that does tests of overall efficiency by measuring the total energy required to complete a task, which should be especially enlightening when comparing Atom and Bobcat.
|
|
#562
|
|||
|
|||
|
Amazingly enough, Atom looks like it's made it's own market. Too bad that market is "too powersucking for smartphones 2011 and not powerful enough for netbooks 2011".
Reading that pc perspective link, and a few others, it occurs to me that a lot of them have mentioned the same thing - that Zacate won't be up against current i5's, but SB. Aside from the fact that there is no guarantee of this, as the market for seriously overpriced and underperforming 18w chips is about to die horribly - At best you'd expect to see one 5-6 months after Zacate's release. I wonder if they'll mention that SB won't be up against Thuban or Phenom in 2011, but BD and Llano. |
|
#563
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agreed. It would be interesting to see 3-way competition in this field. Via may not be able to compete against high end Intel chips but they do know a thing or two about lower wattage.
__________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: Those who like bacon and those who will be used as fodder in the case of a zombie apocalypse. |
|
#564
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For the most part SB will be up against Phenoms in 2011, Llano in Q3 and BD in "late late 2011" |
|
#565
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Begs the question, what would happen if Intel moved everything to the next generation process within a year? WAG, that would increase capex, shorten the depreciation lifecycle and increase annual depreciation, thus increasing the cost per wafer probably to levels higher than AMD will be paying to TSMC and GF. There's no more chipset and value segment free lunch for Intel. |
|
#566
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, except like 45/40 vs. 32/45. Intel basically has their high end on 32nm, while AMD will start on 40nm with low end and then on 32nm with mainstream (Llano).
|
|
#567
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think we're looking at a repositioning of sorts. Bobcat was supposed to be netbook/entry notebook but now it's scaling up to desktop, Llano was supposed to be mainstream notebook now it's "higher end client" and I'm sure I saw an old slide claiming BD was going to be "mainstream client" a while back, but the last one was targeted at "enthusiast". |
|
#568
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sure. There are several high and low ends depending on whether you consider price, performance or power. There are also differences between mobile and desktop markets.
My thoughts are that Bobcat will be low end - mainstream on mobile, while Llano will scale up to high end. On the desktop Bobcat will surely be low end (nettops, maybe HTPC), while Llano may be mostly mainstream. High end will probably stay with Deneb/Thuban until BD. |
|
#569
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's the "Celeron" line, which goes SB in Q3. This is where you might see a single-core SB fight with Zacate. The "Pentium" line, a little stronger, goes SB in Q2. |
|
#570
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|