Yesterday we told you that Intel’s canceling of a major server product could have a silver lining. What was SemiAccurate talking about?
The short story is that it shows Intel is actually doing the obvious, and right, thing for once. Problems that were quite clear to many observers starting in 2018 for servers and 2016 for process tech seemed to be ignored internally. Worse yet they were doubled down on and brought to market even if they when, if perfectly executed, would lose badly against the competition. It was systemic rank idiocy, corporate catabolization by policy, again and again. And it didn’t change until Pat Gelsinger forced the issue.
So back to the current chip cancellation. Is it a good thing or another sign of rot?
Note: The following is for professional and student level subscribers.
Disclosures: Charlie Demerjian and Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc. have no consulting relationships, investment relationships, or hold any investment positions with any of the companies mentioned in this report.
Charlie Demerjian
Latest posts by Charlie Demerjian (see all)
- Zerendipity Shows Off Stick-On Vapor Chamber - Mar 13, 2026
- AI PCs Have Failed Miserably, Can We Just Admit It? - Mar 11, 2026
- Adata Shows Off Quad-Ranked DDR5 CUDIMMs At High Speed - Feb 13, 2026
- Qualcomm Desperately Tried To Hide Snapdragon X2 Elite Power Use - Feb 11, 2026
- Cybersight Does Biking Glasses Right With Zenith - Feb 9, 2026