|
Thursday March 11, 2010 -- 01:21 PM
|
||
|
|
||
Intel kills consumer Larrabee, focuses on future variantsNot a shock, dev and HPC platform at firstby Charlie DemerjianDecember 4, 2009
This change of direction was pretty well assured because the first Larrabee chip was so late. If you are a year late in the GPU business, that is an unrecoverable deficit. While some may say that this is a failure, they probably don't understand the magnitude of the task that Intel undertook. It is not simply a GPU, it is the next generation of vector compute parts. Looking into the crystal ball, we see that Larrabee 1 and 2 were very similar, and Larrabee 3 was a very different part. Given that, we would expect Larrabee 2 to be dropped as well, and effort to focus on Larrabee 3 as a GPU. The more interesting thing is the release of an HPC SKU, so there will be Larrabees available for that task. Given that it was always going to be a better HPC part than a GPU, this is a good step to get the parts out into the field. At SemiAccurate, we have been waiting to see Larrabee for a long time, the author was the first to break the code name more than three years ago, and the first to describe the architecture almost three years ago. It was a good idea then, and it is a good idea now. Given the likely downplaying of two generations of parts, I guess we will have to wait a while longer. The end result is still the right thing for Intel, and the future of computing, it will just take a bit longer to get there.S|A File under Servers and Microprocessors and Graphics and Channel and Desktop and Gaming and Software |
Top 5 Articles
Semi-Related
S|A |
|
| SemiAccurate is a division of Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc. Copyright © 2009 Stone Arch Networking Services, Inc, all rights reserved. | ||